Archive for February, 2008

Feb 28 2008

Lawschool’s American Idol!!!

                                       

                        
                   And the winner is….. The JUMPY JUNIORS!!!

I
am not biased (though this is my original batch before I took a leave
and transferred to evening section).  They ranked third, but for many
of us the Juniors are the winners.  They gave the best rendition of Minsang Lang Kitang Iibigin and their Seasons of Love was fantastic! 

                        

                        
I salute my friends Kat Aglibot (super sexy mo!), Virgil Ligutan (super tangkad at gwapo mo and you were like actually jumping as you glide when you reach for your high notes ), and my twin Cecille Tuason (you were a bomb! super feel na feel and you had the best smile ).

I also congratulate the evening section for winning second place :) . Bravo Bernard, Rica,  Ia and Jeff


Malcolm Idolaw is the first concert ever of the UP Law Community showcasing talents of professors and students to let the whole world know na TAO RIN KAMI
and we are never ever DULL contrary to popular belief.  This is a
project of the LSG (Law Student Government) and UP LAW Class 1982. 

My few comments:

1.
Professor Pulido-Tan the master of ceremonies and professor of Taxation
was a revelation that evening.  We didn’t know she can make people
laugh in that way rin pala.


Dean Carlota


Dean Carlota beside the piano

2.
Dean Carlota — his was my favorite solo performance.  Our Dean can
sing!!!! Beat that!  His rendition of SMILE (though your heart is
aching…) as he said, is truly a banner song for all lawstudents when
the going gets rough
.


Our demi-god Oblicon Prof. Labitag

3. Prof. Labitag — impressive baritone.  He could sing!!!!


Justice De Leon

4. Justice De Leon my another favorite is a real pro.  A former member of UP Madrigals.  Splendid splendid!

                        

5.
And my oh my… Ms. Lorybeth Baldrias (LSG President) and Dean
Carlota’s duet of Somewhere Out There was beautiful.  Ms. Lorybeth’s
voice was truly angelic.


Prof. Concepcion

                         

6.
My another favorite is the rendition of the portia trio with Prof. Chit
Jardaleza.  The songs are easy listening and relaxing.  Ma’am Chit
could carry a tune… though she says she has a bathroom voice who only
sings in the bathroom.

Congratulations everyone who participated and to the LSG for a job well done.

The new MALCOLM IDOLAW!!!! (pronounced as IDOLO… okay? ) makes me want to audition and sing for next year. 

Sing you in COURT!!!

FOR VIDEO clips, click below:
http://mgytorralba.multiply.com/journal/item/218/Clips_from_Malcolm_Idolaw>Clips from Malcolm Idolaw

No responses yet

Feb 28 2008

Lawschool’s American Idol!!!

                                       

                        
                   And the winner is….. The JUMPY JUNIORS!!!

I
am not biased (though this is my original batch before I took a leave
and transferred to evening section).  They ranked third, but for many
of us the Juniors are the winners.  They gave the best rendition of Minsang Lang Kitang Iibigin and their Seasons of Love was fantastic! 

                        

                        
I salute my friends Kat Aglibot (super sexy mo!), Virgil Ligutan (super tangkad at gwapo mo and you were like actually jumping as you glide when you reach for your high notes ), and my twin Cecille Tuason (you were a bomb! super feel na feel and you had the best smile ).

I also congratulate the evening section for winning second place :) . Bravo Bernard, Rica,  Ia and Jeff


Malcolm Idolaw is the first concert ever of the UP Law Community showcasing talents of professors and students to let the whole world know na TAO RIN KAMI
and we are never ever DULL contrary to popular belief.  This is a
project of the LSG (Law Student Government) and UP LAW Class 1982. 

My few comments:

1.
Professor Pulido-Tan the master of ceremonies and professor of Taxation
was a revelation that evening.  We didn’t know she can make people
laugh in that way rin pala.


Dean Carlota


Dean Carlota beside the piano

2.
Dean Carlota — his was my favorite solo performance.  Our Dean can
sing!!!! Beat that!  His rendition of SMILE (though your heart is
aching…) as he said, is truly a banner song for all lawstudents when
the going gets rough
.


Our demi-god Oblicon Prof. Labitag

3. Prof. Labitag — impressive baritone.  He could sing!!!!


Justice De Leon

4. Justice De Leon my another favorite is a real pro.  A former member of UP Madrigals.  Splendid splendid!

                        

5.
And my oh my… Ms. Lorybeth Baldrias (LSG President) and Dean
Carlota’s duet of Somewhere Out There was beautiful.  Ms. Lorybeth’s
voice was truly angelic.


Prof. Concepcion

                         

6.
My another favorite is the rendition of the portia trio with Prof. Chit
Jardaleza.  The songs are easy listening and relaxing.  Ma’am Chit
could carry a tune… though she says she has a bathroom voice who only
sings in the bathroom.

Congratulations everyone who participated and to the LSG for a job well done.

The new MALCOLM IDOLAW!!!! (pronounced as IDOLO… okay? ) makes me want to audition and sing for next year. 

Sing you in COURT!!!

FOR VIDEO clips, click below:
http://mgytorralba.multiply.com/journal/item/218/Clips_from_Malcolm_Idolaw>Clips from Malcolm Idolaw

No responses yet

Feb 22 2008

Do You Want Gloria Out?

Published by naomicorpuz under Current Affairs, Lawyering

 

                                Cast your vote HERE.

                                                          

                      GMA, are you in
                                                    

                                                  or out? 

    Before you cast your vote in this poll, please read the links below so you have an idea that PRO and ANTI - RALLYISTS/GMA/CALL for RESIGNATIONS co-exist in a nation,
or a community in that matter.  And to be informed that: though many
are rallying on the streets to have her out, there are people existing
who choose her to stay.

In random views:

Person A.
Person B. (You have to join his network)
Person C.
Person D. (You have to join his network)
Person E.
Person F.

(If you want to add a link, let the author of this blog know.  Gracias).

Cast your vote and be heard!!!

4 responses so far

Feb 19 2008

Scribbling on Divorce: Addendum

Published by naomicorpuz under Lawyering

I have been receiving comments on my previous post: Scribbling on Divorce here in friendster, in my multiply blog (a replicate of this blog) and in my personal e-mails. 

While some agreed, others objected.

I want to keep this as open, objective and two-sided as possible.  I
don’t take it personally against them, though some seemingly sound to
attack me personally.  However I want to let the people know that I
respect their opinion, and deserve a fair share of space. 

Read on…

Tin Guevarra

a friend
former Associate Editor of Sinag — CSSP, UP Diliman Official Publication
former YFC leader, San Juan MM
former guidance counsellor of PISAY - Philippine Science Highschool
Medical Student - University of Sto. Tomas (present)

If there is already and existing system, especially in our country, why add another one? According to the site you sent me http://www.filipinawives.com/Annulment.htm,
our country already has a family code on annulment so whether you’re
Catholic or not, you’re qualified to file annulment according to the
enumerated grounds. So why add another system if the present suffices?

About
the "grounds proposed by Rep. Maza", I dont know about that (I don’t
have much time to read on that, maybe next time. Besides, Im not a law
student hehe) what I know is she is a feminist. So, she must have bias
towards the good of women (and children? I dont know). I think the idea
of divorce would be more inviting for some if it has come from somebody
neutral. But then again, you know me =P I think nobody and nothing can
convince me to become a divorce advocate. Kaya nga kahit busy ako e,
nagcocomment ako, sabi mo eh! =P hehehe

The difference of
divorce and (Church) annulment, I guess, is that the Church is more
stringent and meticulous in such cases that’s why it takes time because
people can’t just marry and divorce, marry and divorce, and marry and
divorce, which not only makes void the union in marriage but also the
sanctity of the vow, "For better or worse, til death do us part."

Special
cases like abuse, infidelity, shotgun marriages, are dealt with aptly
by annulment. Even if divorce is already used in the West, it doesn’t
mean it is right or it fits our culture. Studies on the lives of those
who underwent divorce as well as their families should be done and Im
sure a great percentage would show that really, divorce didn’t do
anything good (long term) to them. Again, special cases like abuse,
infidelity, shotgun marriages, are dealt with aptly by annulment.

Marital
problems are values problems. Compatibility should be assessed before
marriage and re-assessed til the end of their lifetime by withstanding
the storms life brings to their relationship. Somehow I could not
separate the idea of divorce as the solution for the infidels. And I
strongly abhor that! Because for me, divorce is a "light" to those
hiding in the dark…you know what I mean. And it keeps them confident
in staying in the dark. Thus, our generation marks the destruction of
families, which is the basic unit of the society. I dont want to be a
part of that.

Divorce is a "temporary solution". Why opt for something "temporary"? And why go for something that has "co-morbidities"?

Thanks, Naoms, for allowing me to comment even if I dont know much about laws. =P Intriguing topic you have! hehehe *( ^ ^, )*


Dr. Gerardo S. Fernando

an Uncle
Member, Couples for Christ Vancouver Canada,

Pediatrician
Former member of the Faculty of F.E.U. Institute of Medicine

Owner, O Thai Restaurant, Vancouver Canada

 

I think…Void from the very start can be ground for annulment

Falsification   getting a marriage license as 20 or 21 when actually
they are 15/16
;
One is   of different religion Buddhist or one is Catholic can be
annulled but not a ground for Divorce
Forced to   sign documents…
Getting married outrside of the church example in the beach,  which is
officiated by the Priest… why because they are not allowed to officiate the
marriage outside of the church.. ( I Think). In the above even if there is no
conflict, Annulment can proceed.. why? because they are void from the start.

If the partners are physically/emotiona lly/spiritually at war they need
counselling not divorce. One need to be humble and be sorry forthe hurt one has
done, and the other to accept  and give the forgiveness.  Pride is
the cause of the conflict which should not be tolerated  by Divorce.

The Divorce law is for lawyers to earn more. Sorry Naomi.

We should consider all aspects before even considering  it( Divorce)
as the solution … Pinag iisipan, pinagaaralan, ano ang magiging effecto nito
sa atin, ating familya  kaibigan at iba pang tao., hindi lamang ang ating
sarili. Kung ang problema hindi magkasundo.. baka may iba pang paraan para
magkaintindihah. I gave your parents as example,  at times couples
have  mis understanding, minsan fights, minsan deep tampuhan and
duringthat time that there is conflict the only solution one considers would
be  a divorce kasi physically, emotionally, financially  ay
naafectohan.   It is not enough to say mas importante ang telephone
bils at etc.. This will affect the future generations our future families. so
one must really have a stand. The right Stand.

  God Bless.

This is very interesting communications among all of us. We ahve learned a lot.
We express what is inside us.  And at the end we all thank the Lord for
our family. That is why we ask the Lord to bless our marriage , our family.

As for the case of Amy and Brix,   their relationship need further
scrutiny/evaluation …. It looks galit
talaga sila sa isa’t isa. parang walang forgiveness at walang humility to
accept one’s mistake and ask for forgiveness. .  At the start , they both
love each other at the end  what is left is one’s anger and pride. What do
they need, spiritual advice, counselling , renewal  and total acceptance
of mistakes and forgiveness. We attended  a   family retreat.
One speaker was asked how many times will he forgive his wife if she committed
adultery. He answered a 100 times. one of the couples we knew had the same
problem. But the girl fall in love with a lesbian. The husband became
physically abusive. What should he do. He asked us. i told him what the
speakers have said. I will keep my family intact. I will forgive her.  The
children knew of what had happened. They only asked one thing to their parents.
they forgive them of what had happened to them. The request,  please do
not file for divorce  you can live on separate beds under one roof but
please do not file for divorce. The husband prayed hard. He asked forgiveness
for the hurts/insult and the pain  of being an abusive husband and forgive
her wife of what she did.  I do not know what the wife did… but now they
are living a testimony of forgiveness and humility and very happy as a family.
God bless.

Let us stand for what is right  or righteous all the time.Sometimes we
will be ridiculed for what we stand for. or we amy not be popular. Thank you
and God Bless every one.

Love, T. Joji

Allan Fernando

a Good-looking cousin
A Father of 3

Professional, San Francisco, California

Note: In reaction to my answers to the questions in my previous post.
 

Just a layman’s view. Peace…

 

How do you
differentiate divorce from annulment?

  

I think the catholic church doesn’t allow re-marriage after a divorce
as opposed to annulment (as long as approved by the church herself).


Are you in favor on the
legalization of divorce?

  
I don’t think convenience should be a reason for preferring divorce
over annulment.  As I understand them, the process are both tedious,
highly emotional and often times traumatic (I don’t mind being labelled
psychologically incapacitated as long as makalaya ako sa impyernong buhay
kasama ng bruha kong asawa.) They both will also cost you a fortune.

 

By the way, I’m "okay" with divorce (as I’m okay with
annulment, too).

 

 

What are the grounds
for divorce proposed by Rep. Liza Maza?

 
This is where my problem is.  I’ve known a few people here that
went through divorces and ended up paying alimony to their wives.  The
collapse of their marriages weren’t  100% the husbands’ fault but being
more successful in their carreers than their partners, they ended up writing
checks every month for the alimony to their former wives (aside from child
support for their kids who often times end up with the moms).

   
What is your stand
on  the divorce bill?

 Answered already in the 2nd question.  (I’m more worried about my
telephone and electric bills).
 

 
Isn’t this against your
Catholic teaching?

 This would be a very delicate subject.  There will always be
conflicts between state laws and church doctrines.  It’s like science and
religion, if you believe in God, you will find it hard to accept Charles
Darwin’s theory of evolution or the "Big Bang Theory" of the solar
system.  I would only see divorce as some solution to legal matters.
As for my faith, I’ll still pray and attend masses. I’ll probably just cross my
arms by my chest and bow my head for the priest’s blessing (’coz if I’m not
mistaken, they won’t let me receive the host).  It’s hard to belong to a
group and not believe in their beliefs and ideas.  I’d rather get out of
the circle.

Doesn’t the divorce
bill violate the constitution in which it declares that “the state has the
obligation to protect the family as an inviolable social institution?”

 Masyado kasing nagmamadali sa pag-aasawa, eh.  Sabi nga ng mga
matatanda, "ang pag-aasawa ay hindi parang mainit na kaning isusubo, na
iluluwa mo pag napaso". 

Sana

magkaroon na lang ng preventive law rather than cure.

 
If ratified, wouldn’t
this be alarming that there might be a sudden mad rush to have courts to have
marriages terminated and people will file for divorce in the simplest pretext
(In US, i.e. snoring, not tightening the cap of the toothpaste, and a spouse
spending hours on the telephone).

I don’t believe
there will be a mad rush in divorce applications.  We, filipinos, are too
proud to let others know our failures (to raise a family or maintain a solid
marriage, etc.).  Aside from the fact that this will cost a lot
(magkano na ba kilo ng manok sa Pilipinas?  Sine yata eh P100.00 na sa
orchestra.)

….

I know they’ve (and us, too) been through a lot but, to quote myself on my
earlier statement… .."Ang
hirap kasing magbigay ng diretsong opinion coming from a well intact and so
very loving family, eh.  Pero, to contradict my earlier statement, I think
covenience wise (not in the procedural sense but more on the ending of
emotional, physical and mental sufferings of the "bitter" halves)
siguro we should have divorce in the Phil. Magkakatalo lang siguro sa mga
requirements, kasi I don’t think we can 100% pattern it with the westerners
because of our traits and cultural peculiarity. Generally, masyado kasing close
knit ang pamilya ng mga Yonip"
 

 
Our family (clan) is
bound by too much love and forgiveness; and mantled by Nanay’s prayers,
humility and love, so with that in mind, it’s kinda (naks, masyadong slang, ‘di
na lang sabihing "kind of") hard for me to really give a strait
forward opinion and make a solid stand on this issue.  So it’s really
50/50 for me (Naomi, this also qualifies as an opinion from a very confused
individual, ha). 

We probably should
consider it as a very last resort for legal marriages, which cannot be saved
anymore by in any ways, including numerous counsellings, to dissolve.
But, as I also stated earlier, stict requirements must be set and all petty
reasons be disqualified (like paghihilik, bad breath, b.o., pag-inom,
etc.)  Or better yet, only batteries (physical and mental, lalo na to the
point na halos patayin na ang pamilya sa gulpi) of spouses and/or children
should be the only ground for divorce ( as I know this is the main reason for
the introduction of this bill). 

Kaya nga sabi ko

sana

mag-introduce na
lang sila ng preventive bill kaysa cure.  Nowadays kasi in the

Philippines

masyado nang liberated and mga kabataan and the proliferation of cheap and
quickie motels like SOGO which, I believe, often times admit minors.  This
will surely lead to so many thing including unwanted pregnancies and forced
(moral, physical and mental) marriages.  Dito na magreresulta ang mga
failed marriages,  Then again, this will be a separate topic. Hay naku,
sabi na nga ba masyadong complicated ang issue na ito.  Masyadong
sanga-sanga.  Baka nga kahulihan n’yan isisi lahat ang mga problema natin
sa poverty (as what I used to learn in my Sociology back then), or sa labandera
d’yan (hindi nga ba? shhh).


Well anyways, I’m happy
medyo naalis ang utak ko sa mga problema at masyado akong nag-eenjoy mag-isip
ng ibang bagay na wala namang relasyon sa aking buhay.

 

Laging nagmamahal,
kapamilya at kapuso ninyo (kasangbahay  na rin - UNTV channel 37)

 

Sharon Lovendino


a Good-looking cousin
A Loving Mother of 3
Nurse Graduate,  Fatima University

Hi everyone, 

 

 

I
am reading your blog about divorce and annulment… .I also read
tintin’s comment. and i agree with her but at first i really don’t want
to comment about it. since pag dating sa law everything is different…
.pero nabasa ko din some emails not all ni tito joji…

 

considering
my marriage is not really good but i am not thinking about annulment
and divorce… NO!NO! god bind us and it is only GOD with seperate
us…i am noot really considering divorce because marriage is not only
for husbands and wives, the reason why people get married is because
they want to have family which consist of mom and dad, children and
family of both parents(the typical filipino family always extended as
in super extended)… kaya if one consider divorce maraming buts and
cons and matters na have to consider especially the feeling of the
kids…. tignan mo sa streets maraming bata ang napariwara dahil wala
ng magulang or nanay lang ang kasama at nagtratrabaho pa…in short
walang gumagabay sa kanila kaya nag kaganun sila…if we legallize
divorce marami ng hindi mag hohold on sa marriage bows na sinumpaan sa
house ni god kasama at na witness ng buong family at friends
mo….medyo barok ako mag explain but i hope you get the msg… pag
legal na yun iisipin ng isa ay di kami mag kasundo kasi ang asawa ko
ganito ganito kaya dapat mag divorce na lang kami…pero if walang
divorce ganto ang sasabihin mo…." GOD, please help us to be strong,
enlightened both my mind and my partner, let our kids understand our
trials and help us to explain to them that we will make it through
cause were FAMILY…" at mag uusap kayong mag asawa at mag tratry
kayong ayusin yun….basta ganun…. i don’t like divorce!!!!


Jaz

friend
Student, Carleton University
Highschool, International School of Brussels, Germany

(FYI,
her former schoolmates: grandson of the founder of Toyota Motors in
biology class,  played field hockey with Nicholas Burn’s daughter [the
current under-secretary of state for political affairs in the US],
grandson of Enrique Bolaños [the president of Nicaragua]
 

I
thought this was a very interesting read though, my knowledge about law
is very limited. I was just wondering if this bill has been passed by
the Senate, or not?

 

Also, with regards
to the question about the financial effects of annulment and legal
seperation being different to that of divorce, isn’t divorce as costly?
I mean, here in the West, it’s so expensive for couples to get a
divorce and some ex-wives who are gold diggers make a livin out of it
(i.e. Heather Mills, Paul McCartney’s ex).

 

And
if this is the case, it means that the bill will only be available to
the upper-class couples in the Philippines, which is like 10 to 20% of
the population? So is it really worth having at all? Doesn’t it
perpetuate further inequality? (Correct me if Im wrong pls)

 

Anywhoo,
the topic of divorce in the Philippines can be a positive sign because
it shows that the government and politics are "divorcing" because
politics and religion don’t mix, especially when your citizens don’t
all share the same religion.
 

Sorry I meant to say, "the government and the Catholic Church are ‘divorcing’, not goverment and politics.

Michelle

former classmate, friend
Mother of 2 beautiful kids
BA Behavioral Science Graduate, UP Manila

I
agree with the divorce. I’m happy with my marriage by the way, but I
have friends who are tied with marriage that is already failing yet
they don’t want to seek annulment because it just seems unfair not to
acknowledge a marriage that produces their wonderful children.

No responses yet

Feb 14 2008

Scribbling on Divorce

Published by naomicorpuz under Lawyering

                                          


Sometime during the Summer
of 2005, the Divorce Bill was discussed by some newspaper columnists in the
Philippine Star and Inquirer. I think
this was the time when Rep. Liza Maza resurrected the issue on divorce and
proposed a bill.

 

I wanted to put my reasoning
and analytical skills to test. I thought
it would be a good way to prepare myself for the school of law. So, I started scribbling and writing
questions and answers as my intellectual exercise. One of the topics I chose was divorce.

 

Ms. Janette Toral, the
founder of Digital Filipino of which I am a member, told me personally last
week that she tagged me in digitalfilipino blogspot to write an entry on some
interesting topics like divorce.

 

So I remembered the
scribbling…

 

So Ma’am Janette, here goes…

 

How do you differentiate
divorce from annulment?

 

 Divorce is defined as the termination of the marriage bond while
annulment is making the marriage void from the very start. In both cases the spouses are free to marry
again.

 

Are you in favor on the
legalization of divorce?

Yes, I am in favor of the
legalization of divorce.

 
I do not see any reason why we should be against
it. I do not see any difference between
our existing laws such as annulment and divorce when both are for the
legalization on the invalidation of marriages and making the spouses free to
marry again.

 

I also do not agree that divorce is
violating the constitution in which it declares that “the state has the
obligation to protect the family as an inviolable social institution,” while
annulment is not.

 

I also find divorce to be more
convenient for both spouses since it would be easier for the estranged couples
to marry without carrying the brunt of being labeled psychologically
incapacitated which is the usual case in annulment. The process for annulment and legal
separation can be torturous and both time and money-consuming which seems to be
available only to the moneyed class.

 

What are the grounds for
divorce proposed by Rep. Liza Maza?

 

Divorce
can be filed on the grounds that:

*separation of the couple for
atleast 5 years upon the filing of petition and reconciliation is highly
improbable

*the petitioner has been legally
separated from his or her spouse for atleast 2 years at the time of the filing
of the petition and reconciliation is highly improbable

*when any of the grounds for legal
separation has caused the irreparable breakdown of marriage

*one of both spouses are psychologically
incapacitated to comply with the essential marital obligations

 

The
effects of divorce would be:

*marriage bonds are terminated

*the absolute conjugal property will
be liquidated and assets are divided equally between spouses

*the spouse who is not gainfully
employed shall be entitled of support from the other spouse

*the custody of any minor child
shall be decided by the court

*children of both spouses shall be
considered legitimate

 

What is your stand on the
divorce bill?

 I do not have any problems with the divorce bill.

 

Isn’t this against your
Catholic teaching?

 

 I find the Church inconsistent with what they teach with regard
to providing remedies to failed marriages, which are legal separation and
annulment.

 

Legal Separation is the separation
from bed and board where spouses’ marriage are retained and not free to marry
again while annulment is legally invalidating the marriage and allows the
couples to marry again – which is the same as divorce. They only differentiate divorce as  the termination of the marriage bond from
annulment as making the marriage void from the very start. I don’t find these definitions making much
sense because whether divorce or annulment will take place it is common that
prior to this there has been an actual experience of the marriage to begin
with, they both share good and bad memories of that failed marriage and they
both share children as a product of this marriage.

 

 I do not see the reason why the Church has to be against divorce
when they also have a marriage tribunal that performs annulment (which
legalizes the invalidation of the marriage and making them free to marry again
– like divorce).

 

Doesn’t the divorce bill
violate the constitution in which it declares that “the state has the obligation
to protect the family as an inviolable social institution?”

 

 I don’t think the State violates this obligation because there
are marriages which can no longer be healthy for both spouses, especially to
the children emotionally. Situations
such as physical and emotional abuse (no mutual respect), infidelity, painful
quarrels that the children have to endure almost everyday and situations where
either of the spouse is not performing his or her task to the family – as a
homemaker or as a provider are in my opinion is a marriage that can no longer
be considered as an “inviolable social institution.” Thus there is no point of preserving it.

If ratified, wouldn’t this
be alarming that there might be a sudden mad rush to have courts to have
marriages terminated and people will file for divorce in the simplest pretext
(In US, i.e. snoring, not tightening the cap of the toothpaste, and a spouse
spending hours on the telephone).

 

Though couples at times have shallow
reasons why they want to have divorce, we also can not deny the fact that there
are marriages that can no longer work no matter how hard the couples try.

 This is also the reason why there are certain grounds proposed
by Rep. Maza before divorce can even be considered. These grounds suggest that divorce shouldn’t
be taken lightly. 

 

Sources:

 

Philippine
Daily Inquirer and Philippine Star – Summer of 2005

Editorial
Section with columns on Divorce Bill

16 responses so far

Next »